May 19th - September 25thTom Patterson TheatreTicket Info
No reviews have been posted yet for this show.
Traditional arts journalism is in decline. Now more than ever, this independent website and our podcast fill a growing void.
We've had over 1.5 million page views, and are grateful that you are here.
We rely on readers — and a handful of advertisers who share our values — to make our work possible. When we raised funds for our podcast, The "Performers Podcast," the average donation from people like you was $96.
Now we hope you’ll join us in augmenting our coverage of arts in the region by making a one-time donation today.
This is a listing for the 2011 season.
For the current 2023 shows click here.
McKenna's Richard is charismatic too...
“There’s a menacing element to McKenna’s Richard that’s downright unnerving. When he hobbles by a group of bystanders he stares one down like a wide-eyed gangster in a prison yard. It’s uncomfortable and makes him feel unpredictable.”
2 1/2 Stars: “…there is a pleasing, extra level of irony added to certain lines, as when Richard tells his brother Clarence, who is being sent off to the Tower by his own scheming, that their sister-in-law, the king’s wife, is to blame: “Why, this it is, when men are ruled by women.”
4 Stars: “McKenna ultimately demonstrates more than enough steel to prove this to be far more than mere stunt casting…But given a magnificent production, instead of this fancy-dress war horse designed by Peter Hartwell, and placed in the hands of a director of sweeping vision, she could have created a truly impressive proof that true talent knows no gender.”
” After all, doesn’t evil transcend gender or sexual orientation?
…It’s an intriguing goal. That she rises to the challenge without declaring victory is not a slight on her acting abilities….McKenna’s problems are due in large part to the absence of an overall concept on the part of Potter.”
3 Stars: First impression review, to be followed up shortly with a full analysis. “The first half is excellent, schadenfreude-filled fun…Potter’s production ultimately favours clarity over flavour – and the gasping ghosts of Richard’s victims at the end don’t have the haunting effect no doubt intended….”
1 1/2 Stars: “…the most disappointing part about Miles Potter’s production…is that — having apparently used up all his imagination coming up with the central concept of having Richard played by a woman—he then proceeded to do so little with it…Potter stages scene after scene without a scrap of invention”